Breaking news and in-depth analysis on Israel, Middle East, global politics, defense, and economy.

Screening vs. treatment: What caused the reduction in breast cancer mortality since 1975?






That is the answer Caswell-Jin et al. (2024) aim to answer. The authors used 4 cancer mortality models within CISNET for this study:

Model D (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). Used to define a set of disease states and implemented analytic formulations to estimate the association of interventions on transitions between these states, as well as on breast cancer incidence and mortality.Model M (MD Anderson Cancer Center). Relied on a a bayesian approach, which asseded the probability distributions for unknown parameters, including treatment benefits, and fitting to observed breast cancer mortalitymodel S (Stanford University). A microsimulation that modelled natural history of disease based on tumor size and stage progression mapped to detection; treatments benefits were applied to baseline survival curves based on stage, age, and estrogen receptor (ER)/ERBB2 (formerly HER2) status at detection.model W (University of Wisconsin–Harvard). This model used a tumor growth framework and was calibrated incidence and mortality based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registry. This model also incorporated a cure fraction.

Categories of breast cancer by ER/ERBB2 status (ER+/ERBB2−, ER+/ERBB2+, ER−/ERBB2+, and ER−/ERBB2−) were modeled separately.

Using this approach, the authors found that:

The breast cancer mortality rate in the US (age adjusted) was 48/100 000 women in 1975 and 27/100 000 women in 2019. In 2019, the combination of screening, stage I to III treatment, and metastatic treatment was associated with a 58% reduction (model range, 55%-61%) in breast cancer mortality. Of this reduction, 29% (model range, 19%-33%) was associated with treatment of metastatic breast cancer, 47% (model range, 35%-60%) with treatment of stage I to III breast cancer, and 25% (model range, 21%-33%) with mammography screening. Based on simulations, the greatest change in survival after metastatic recurrence occurred between 2000 and 2019, from 1.9 years (model range, 1.0-2.7 years) to 3.2 years (model range, 2.0-4.9 years).

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2813878

You can read the full paper here.





Source link

Hot this week

Quick Facts About Mexico’s Jewish President-elect, Claudia Sheinbaum

Mexico elected a new president this week, with...

Auto-component maker Sundram Fasteners’ Q3 net profits at Rs 116.19 cr

Auto-component maker Sundram Fasteners Ltd has reported a...

How Does The Dichotomy Of Secularism And Religion Manifest In Israeli Politics?

Over the years, the interplay between secularism and religion...

Agritech in Israel – Innovations Transforming Global Agriculture

With a wealth of innovative technologies, Israel has emerged...

Celeb Stylist Says This ’90s Dress Trend Will Rule Sunday’s Red Carpet

Celebrity stylist Molly Levin predicts one of the biggest...

Prime Video’s ad free subscription becomes Prime Video Ultra for $4.99 a month

Amazon is updating its ad-free streaming offering by introducing...

Talos Energy stock hits 52-week high at $13.86

Talos Energy stock has reached a 52-week high, trading...

Microsoft Edge is getting desktop shortcuts for user profiles

Summary created by Smart Answers AI In summary: PCWorld...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img