HomeHealthScreening vs. treatment: What caused the reduction in breast cancer mortality since...

Screening vs. treatment: What caused the reduction in breast cancer mortality since 1975?






That is the answer Caswell-Jin et al. (2024) aim to answer. The authors used 4 cancer mortality models within CISNET for this study:

Model D (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). Used to define a set of disease states and implemented analytic formulations to estimate the association of interventions on transitions between these states, as well as on breast cancer incidence and mortality.Model M (MD Anderson Cancer Center). Relied on a a bayesian approach, which asseded the probability distributions for unknown parameters, including treatment benefits, and fitting to observed breast cancer mortalitymodel S (Stanford University). A microsimulation that modelled natural history of disease based on tumor size and stage progression mapped to detection; treatments benefits were applied to baseline survival curves based on stage, age, and estrogen receptor (ER)/ERBB2 (formerly HER2) status at detection.model W (University of Wisconsin–Harvard). This model used a tumor growth framework and was calibrated incidence and mortality based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registry. This model also incorporated a cure fraction.

Categories of breast cancer by ER/ERBB2 status (ER+/ERBB2−, ER+/ERBB2+, ER−/ERBB2+, and ER−/ERBB2−) were modeled separately.

Using this approach, the authors found that:

The breast cancer mortality rate in the US (age adjusted) was 48/100 000 women in 1975 and 27/100 000 women in 2019. In 2019, the combination of screening, stage I to III treatment, and metastatic treatment was associated with a 58% reduction (model range, 55%-61%) in breast cancer mortality. Of this reduction, 29% (model range, 19%-33%) was associated with treatment of metastatic breast cancer, 47% (model range, 35%-60%) with treatment of stage I to III breast cancer, and 25% (model range, 21%-33%) with mammography screening. Based on simulations, the greatest change in survival after metastatic recurrence occurred between 2000 and 2019, from 1.9 years (model range, 1.0-2.7 years) to 3.2 years (model range, 2.0-4.9 years).

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2813878

You can read the full paper here.





Source link

Hot this week

Why Mariah the Scientist Might Be R&B’s Most Honest Voice Right Now

There’s a moment, before the cameras fully settle and...

Irish footballers, celebrities urge boycott of Israel match over Gaza war

Leading Irish footballers have joined with celebrities in a...

The surprising link between a healthy diet and the serious disease

A diet rich in fruits, vegetables and whole grains...

Russia Ramps Up Threats Toward Ukraine Over Victory Day Parade

Russia and Ukraine are trading threats and attacks ahead...

Israel's Noam Bettan dazzles in second Eurovision rehearsal as FBI helps with security

Noam Bettan and the Israeli delegation gave another dazzling...
Advertisementspot_img

Related Articles

Advertisementspot_imgspot_img