[ad_1]
Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the world
Sign up to our free Morning Headlines email
Sign up to our free Morning Headlines email
The construction of three new towns will begin before the next election, the Housing Secretary will pledge at Labour’s party conference.
Steve Reed is expected to tell Labour members on the opening day of the party’s annual gathering in Liverpool that the government will “do whatever it takes to get Britain building”.
The priority for construction in the current Parliament will likely be Tempsford the “most promising sites” in Bedfordshire, Leeds South Bank, and Crews Hill, north London.
While the work on 12 new towns will also be taken forward, as recommended by a report from the Government’s New Towns Taskforce, published on Sunday morning.
Each of the dozen new towns will have at least 10,000 homes, and could collectively result in 300,000 houses being built across England.
Mr Reed is expected to welcome a recommendation by the New Towns Taskforce that at least 40 per cent of these new homes should be affordable.
In its manifesto, Labour pledged to begin work on 1.5 million new homes over the course of the Parliament, to expand homeownership to more Britons.
open image in gallery
In his speech at Labour conference, Housing Secretary Steve Reed is expected to say: “We will fight for hard-working people, locked out of a secure home for too long by the Conservative government of blockers.
“This Labour Government won’t sit back and let this happen. I will do whatever it takes to get Britain building. We’ve got to ‘build baby build’.”
In a nod to the new towns programme established by Clement Attlee’s post-war Labour government, Mr Reed will add: “This party built new towns after the war to meet our promise of homes fit for heroes.
“Now, with the worst economic inheritance since that war, we will once again build cutting-edge communities to provide homes fit for families of all shapes and sizes.
“I am launching the next generation of new towns taking the lessons from the post-war Labour government housing boom… mobilising the full power of the state to build a new generation of new towns and restore the dream of home ownership to thousands of families across the country.”
Ahead of the speech, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: “For so many families, homeownership is a distant dream.
“My Labour Government will sweep aside the blockers to get homes built, building the next generation of new towns.”
open image in gallery
Among the steps Labour plans to take to speed up housing development is a “New Towns Unit”, aimed at pumping both private and public cash into transport links, GP surgeries, schools and open green spaces in its new settlements.
The Unit will work with leading architects to ensure the new towns have their own unique character and identity, intended to reflect their local area.
Ministers also plan to model the construction and planning effort behind each town on the regeneration of Stratford, east London, before and after the 2012 Olympic games.
The Olympic park and the surrounding housing, was overseen by a development corporation, a body with sweeping powers which allowed it to compulsorily purchase land and grant planning permission.
While some of the new towns Labour plans to build will be standalone settlements, others will be expansions of existing towns, or new areas within cities.
Among the dozen locations are sites in Cheshire, Manchester, Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire, Plymouth and London.
They include:
Environmental assessments need to be carried out before planning and building work for each location can begin in earnest.
Just last week, Mr Reed laid out what he described as a “building acceleration package” in light of the slow growth in housebuilding figures.
Some 80,400 applications were received in the period between April and June 2025, down 5 per cent from the previous year.
Planning authorities across the nation decided on 80,800 applications, down 1 per cent from the same period the previous year.
Mr Reed described the numbers as “unacceptable”.
[ad_2]
Source link
