One of the most talked-about moments in the current season of Married at First Sight arrived yesterday, when Tomer tried to explain his difficulty in being sexually attracted to Leikie and used the term “Madonna–Whore complex.” For many viewers, this was the first time they had heard the expression, but in the world of psychology, this is a particularly long-standing theory, introduced about a century ago by Sigmund Freud.
Although the term sounds extreme and even provocative, it describes a complex phenomenon: Difficulty integrating deep love, respect, and emotional intimacy with sexual desire toward the same partner. In simple terms, the person is capable of loving or desiring, but struggles to connect the two emotions.
When Love and Desire Diverge
Freud referred to the phenomenon as “psychical impotence.” According to him, there are men who “where they love they do not desire and where they desire they cannot love.”
According to the theory, a woman is divided in the subconscious into two separate categories. On one side stands the “Madonna,” a pure, respectable, and idealized figure, someone worthy of love and appreciation. On the other side stands the “whore,” a figure who arouses sexual desire but is not perceived as a life partner or a mother to children.
The problem begins when the actual partner is unconsciously placed in the first category. As love and appreciation for her grow, the sexual desire itself may actually weaken.
Not Only a Men’s Problem
Although the complex was originally described in men, contemporary researchers and therapists believe that the reality is more complex. Women may also experience a split between the image of the exciting and thrilling partner and the safe, loving, and stable partner.
In such cases, a separation is created between the need for emotional security and the need for sexual excitement. As the relationship becomes more stable and committed, some people experience a decline in sexual arousal.
Why does this happen? There is no single explanation accepted by all researchers. The psychoanalytic approach claims that the origin of the phenomenon lies in childhood experiences and the way the individual learned to perceive intimacy, sexuality, and love.
Other researchers point instead to social and cultural influences. For generations, women have been presented in Western culture at two extremes only: The pure and family-oriented woman versus the seductive and sexual woman. When a person internalizes this division, they may struggle to see the same woman as a mother, a partner, and a person who arouses desire.
Education surrounding sexuality also plays a role. In societies where sex is perceived as something to be concealed or ashamed of, it is easier for a split to form between love and sexuality.
When one partner struggles to experience desire toward the person they love, both sides can be hurt.
The partner who does not receive sexual closeness may interpret this as a lack of attraction, rejection, or a lack of love. Conversely, the person experiencing the difficulty may feel guilt, frustration, and confusion, because they actually love their partner very much but are unable to generate sexual attraction as they would like.
More than once a negative cycle is created: As the pressure to have sex increases, anxiety rises and desire drops even further.
Is It Really Common?
It is difficult to know how common the phenomenon is, because there is no official medical diagnosis or agreed-upon criteria. However, psychologists and couples therapists report that a gap between love and desire is one of the most common reasons for crises in the sex lives of couples.
The professional literature also indicates that the phenomenon remains well recognized. Clinical psychologist Eva Hartmann even wrote that this is a complexity that can also be encountered in contemporary patients, despite the social changes that have occurred in recent decades.
Does this mean there is no future for the relationship? Absolutely not. Many therapists believe that the complex is not a decree of fate but a thinking pattern that can be understood and worked on. The first step is awareness. When a person understands that they are separating love from sexuality, it is possible to begin examining the source of the pattern and try to change it.
Couples or sex therapy may assist in creating a new intimacy that is not based on a rigid division between “holy” and “sexual.” Sometimes open conversations about sexuality, fantasies, fears, and expectations actually allow the partners to reconnect emotion and attraction.
Tomer’s confession succeeded in bringing to light a psychological concept that many did not know at all, but in fact, it touches upon a much broader question: Are we capable of seeing the person in front of us as whole and complex, simultaneously loved, respected, and sexually attractive.
Ultimately, long-term relationships rely on the ability to combine friendship, security, and love with desire and curiosity. When one of the components is disconnected from the others, the relationship may enter a crisis. But when one succeeds in connecting them, it is not just about a better sex life, but a deeper and healthier relationship.
Source:
www.jpost.com
